† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by “Materials Research by Information Integration” Initiative (MI2I) project of the Support Program for Starting Up Innovation Hub from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST).
The history and current status of materials data activities from handbook to database are reviewed, with introduction to some important products. Through an example of prediction of interfacial thermal resistance based on data and data science methods, we show the advantages and potential of material informatics to study material issues which are too complicated or time consuming for conventional theoretical and experimental methods. Materials big data is the fundamental of material informatics. The challenges and strategy to construct materials big data are discussed, and some solutions are proposed as the results of our experiences to construct National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) materials databases.
We witness the progress and victory of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in this decade in various fields of our life, from playing chess to automated driving. AI is expanding into most of human activities immensely and overwhelmingly, no exception for science and technology, a representative of crystallization of human wisdom. Today, more and more material scientists start to believe and dream that someday, we will just order a required material function to a robot, and then the robot will design and produce the material for us. However, to generate such a system, tremendous materials experiences and knowledge are necessary for making the robot “clever” and “reliable”. Then we face to a realistic question: do we have enough accumulation of data to train the robot? If not, what should we do? For the first question, most people will agree that the answer is negative. Then the second question becomes the key point to realize the dream. This paper reviews the history and current status of materials data and database, and discusses the future strategy to construct materials big data.
The evolution of data management and dissemination technology of materials data can be divided into three stages: handbook, database, and big data, and the main purpose and application of the materials data systems at each stage change from reference data to material selection and to material development (Fig.
The collection of materials data started from the 1880s. At that time, the data sets were published as handbooks. Beilstein collected data of properties, spectra, and preparation of organic compounds from literatures, and published the first edition of his handbook in 1881.[1] Up to 1989, the 4th edition of Beilstein handbook was published in 503 volumes (over 440000 pages). Since 2009, the content has been maintained and distributed by Elsevier information systems in Frankfurt under the product name “Reaxys”.[2]
Similar work has been done by Landolt and Börnstein[3] since 1883. The current edition of Landolt–Börnstein handbook includes 195000 pages. More than 72000 element systems, 150000 chemical substances, and 530000 substance–property pairs are included. SpringerMaterials[4] is a web platform, which provides data service based on Landolt–Börnstein handbook.
The Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data[5] is published by American Institute of Physics (AIP) Publishing since 1972. One source of the journal contributions is the national standard reference data system (NSRDS), which was established in 1963 to coordinate the production and dissemination of critically evaluated reference data in physical sciences. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) coordinates several data evaluation centers, located in universities, industrial, and government laboratories, as well as within NIST.
In Japan, National Research Institute for Metals (NRIM) published the first NRIM creep data sheet in 1966 and fatigue data sheet in 1976. This work has been continued after the reorganization of NRIM into National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) in 2001. And NIMS published the first NIMS corrosion data sheet in 2002. Up to now, 57 volumes of creep data sheet, 123 volumes of fatigue data sheet, and 4 volumes of corrosion data sheet have been published.[6–8]
Besides these large-scaled comprehensive chemical and physical data collections, many handbooks on specific material properties have also been published. For example, ASM handbook[9] on mechanical properties, and Thermophysical Properties Research Center (TPRC) handbook[10] on thermos-physical properties.
The data handbooks or journals are featured by high-quality data evaluated and selected by experts with high reputation in these fields. The editors did not only put those data together, but also classified and indexed them. For example, Beilstein developed the Beilstein system to classify compounds according to their constitutional features.[1]
The computerized database started in the 1960s. In 1970, Codd[11] published an important paper to propose the use of a relational database model, and his ideas changed the way people thought about databases. In his model, the schema or logical organization of the database is disconnected from physical information storage, and this became the standard principle for database systems. Since then, various relational database system products have been developed, such as MS SQL Server, DB2, Allbase, Oracle, etc.
The database enables us to store, update, and search a large amount of data, quickly, accurately, and securely. It also makes it very easy to transform and reorganize the data, and to generate a new data set for new purposes.
Since the 1990 s, some materials databases have been developed, e.g., Pauling File project,[12] which was launched in 1995 as a collaboration between Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) and Material Phases Data System (MPDS), a Swiss company. Since January 2016, the data has been copyrighted by NIMS and MPDS. The first goal of Pauling File project is to create and maintain a comprehensive materials database for non-organic (no C–H bonds) solid state materials, covering phase diagrams, crystallographic data, diffraction patterns, and physical properties. Up to now, the Pauling File data have been contained in 12 products. AtomWork[13] and AtomWork Adv.[14] are two database systems developed by NIMS. AtomWork is a free database opened to the Internet as a part of NIMS materials database system MatNavi,[15] which contains the Pauling File data before 2001. AtomWork Adv. is a fee-based database released in 2018, which contains the full Pauling File data and will be updated annually. The present version of AtomWork Adv. contains 42406 phase diagrams, 303885 crystal structures, 550507 x-ray diffraction patterns, and 365517 materials properties, extracted from 141490 publications.
In these years, first principle computation has become an efficient method to generate materials data such as electronic structures and properties. Many databases have been established in this way. For example, Novel Materials Discovery (NOMAD) repository[16] is developed as a joint project of Fritz-Haber-Institut (FHI), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HUB), and Max Planck Computer and Data Facility (MPCDF). Materials Project[17] is an integrated framework of data and analysis tools developed by University of California at Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Materials science started with experiments. By concluding and sublimating the experimental data and experiences, we establish knowledge and theories. Then as application of the theories, computation has become an important method to predict the property and find new materials. Finally, the results of theories and computations are verified by experiments. Data science is expected to accelerate and improve this process, because todayʼs computer can store and process such large volumes of data that it allows us to set up algorithms based correlations among material phenomena without understanding the physical and chemical process underground. It is especially useful for studying materials phenomena which are too complex to be modeled by physical or chemical methods. For this purpose, we need data captured from various phenomena with respect to material composition, processing, structure, property, and performance, and with different characteristic spatial and temporal scales.
In 2015, a Japanese national project “Materials Research by Information Integration Initiative (MI2I)” has been launched. The purpose of this project is to accelerate material exploration and development by combining materials data and data science method. As the fundamental of this project, a data platform MI2I-DPF[18] has been constructed. MI2I-DPF is an integration of materials data, data application tools, and computational environment. MI2I-DPF is contemporary opened to the project members and the members of the industrial consortium. The users can access and download nearly a million data entries from 6 main databases of MatNavi through application programming interface (API), and use the tools to analysis or do simulation with the data on the platform. An example of the research results of this project using this system is as follows.
Various material interfaces exist in devices and materials such as composites, alloys, and ceramics. Especially for nanostructured materials, the properties of interfaces play important roles to determine the properties of the materials. However, interface is one of the most difficult issues in material science, because it is affected by numerous equilibrium and nonequilibrium factors.
Interfacial thermal resistance (ITR) is caused by scattering or reflection of phonons and electrons at the interface. Two physical models,[19] acoustic mismatch model (AMM) and diffusion mismatch model (DMM), have been set up to calculate ITR of an interface based on the physical properties, concretely, density, acoustic velocity, and unit cell volume of the materials at two sides. However, comparing the calculation results to the experimental data, we can see that the accuracy of the calculation is not satisfied (Fig.
We try to establish a data model[20] to predict ITR with higher accuracy from two approaches: (I) avoiding to use physical properties with high uncertainty; (II) introducing descriptors other than physical properties. To find an appropriate set of property descriptors, we check the correlations among 11 heat transfer related properties, and select 4 properties which are relatively independent and have less uncertainty. The optimized property descriptor set includes specific heat, melting point, density, and unit cell volume. We also introduce a new descriptor film thickness, since ITR measurements are usually done on samples with a film deposited on a substrate, and film thickness is one of the most basic parameters of film deposition. Although there is no clear theoretical explanation of the influence of film thickness on ITR, the data show an obvious correlation between them. With the new descriptor set and machine learning methods, we obtain much better prediction of ITR than AMM and DMM (Fig.
This example shows the potential of data science in material study. Because it neglects the complicated physical and chemical process between material composition, material structure and material property, it is especially suitable for studies on subjects which cannot be modeled by physical and chemical models.
Data shortage is the biggest difficulty when we apply data science methods to material science. Although the importance of materials database has been well noticed today, data accumulation takes long terms. Nevertheless, for materials, the correlations among composition, structure, and properties allow one descriptor to be substituted by another one or more descriptors, which provides us a possibility to select descriptors with relatively sufficient and high quality data.
The voluminosity and complexity of big data make the traditional data capturing and processing methods difficult to deal with. To construct materials big data, we face challenges of data capture, data storage, data analysis, search, sharing, visualization, information privacy, and data source. Some of these challenges are expected to be solved by progresses of information technology, however, some of them are problems of material science. In this section, we focus our discussion on some issues specified for materials data.
The first problem when we try to combine data from different data sources is to identify the similarity between two materials, because in most cases, the data are obtained on different samples. Scientifically speaking, material can be defined by its chemical composition and structure. However, the characterization of a materialʼs structure is not an easy task, because it covers a large range of scales from atomic to macroscopic scale. Practically, many people use the process conditions to identify a material, however, the conditions are equipment dependent. MatML[23] is a specification from NIST designed for the interchange of materials information. It uses chemical composition and processing conditions to describe a material. Most databases use only chemical composition or chemical formula to identify a material; in these case, materials with different structures are not distinguishable. Based on our experiences with the data of single crystal, ceramics, alloys, and polymers, we have developed a material identification system according to the fundamentals of materials science. In this system, materials are identified at four different levels: chemical system, compound, substance, and material. Figure
Chemical system is the fundamental of all materials. It indicates the element or elements of which the materials is composed. Compound is the second level, which identifies a material at molecular level. For most inorganic materials, the compound can be defined by its chemical formula. However, for organic or polymer materials, molecular structure must be specified. The third level is substance. At this level, the state (gas, liquid, or solid) of a compound should be defined. For solid state, the crystalline state and crystal structure should also be given. In most cases, a substance corresponds to a phase in a phase diagram. The forth level is material. To define a material, many types of information are needed, for example, the material form, size, micro-structure, process condition, etc. It is difficult to define a general descriptor set applicable to all types of material. Since samples prepared by different labs or under different processing conditions are usually different in micro-structure and properties, we treat different samples as different materials, except that the data providers indicate that they are identical at the material level. The four-level system allows us to distinguish each individual sample, meanwhile, to cluster materials according to their common physical and chemical features. Even two samples are different at the material level, if they belong to the same substance, compound, or chemical system, we can still find the relationship between them.
The above material identification system provides a possibility to compare and link materials data at the level of material, substance, compound, and element. However, many practically used materials are composed by multiple substances or materials. In order to make such complex materials comparable, we have designed a hierarchical structure for material description, which can be used to describe materials from atoms to composites. As an example, the hierarchical structure of the SiC/Ti alloy composite is shown in Fig.
Since material identification is a common issue when integrating data from different data sources, a system which manages the identification record of materials in different resources (Fig.
Data science is becoming an important and efficient approach to deal with material issues which are too time consuming for experiments and too complicated for theoretical and computational methods. Materials data is the fundamental, as well as a bottleneck in this scientific innovation. In order to construct materials big data, we are facing to various challenges including up-to-date data collection, long-term data conservation, data sharing, and maximal utilization, etc. Fortunately, physical and chemical laws under all material phenomena can help us to reduce the number of data required. Some solutions have been proposed in this paper as the results of our experiences to construct NIMS materials databases. A successful example has been shown to predict interfacial thermal resistance by machine learning methods.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] |